Least-to-Most Prompting

What is it?

Least-to-most prompting is a hierarchy of support used to teach a skill, beginning with a natural cue. Subsequent prompts are provided in a sequence from the least amount of support, such as providing an expectant pause, to the highest level of support, such as physical assistance. 

How can least-to-most prompting be used with AAC to promote vocalisations? 

In the context of promoting vocalisations using AAC, the hierarchy may be as follows:  


An example of how to implement this with an SGD user is: 

For example: 


 




If the goal is to produce multi-symbolic communication, and the learner provides a single symbol answer, gently encourage them to expand on their response. If this does not produce further relevant symbols, re-engage in the least-to-most prompting procedure.  

 

When the learner successfully meets the communication goal, positive reinforcement could be given through positive and affirmative feedback, such as "That's right, the cat is sleeping." This process can be repeated as you move through the storybook.  

Some guidelines for implementing least-to-most prompting effectively:

Least-to-most prompting can be helpful to develop the learner's skills further; however, if it is a new skill, you may consider using most-to-least prompting instead. When using prompts, we need to be mindful of encouraging the AAC user's independence and be careful that they do not become prompt-dependent by over-prompting them. It is important to pause and provide enough time for the learner to process and respond. 

 

When it comes to prompt selection, there are two primary considerations:  

References

Finke, E.H., Davis, J.M., Benedict, M., Goga, L., Kelly, J., Palumbo, L., Peart, T., & Waters, S. (2017). Effects of a Least-to-Most Prompting Procedure

on Multisymbol Message Production in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(1), 81-98. https://web.p.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=4e2ecbf6-efd4

4816-9674-6ad7aba0bf8c%40redis 


Sigafoos, J., van der Meer, L., Schlosser, R.W., Lancioni, G.E., O'Reilly, M.F., & Green, V.A. (2016). Augmentative and Alternative Communication

(AAC) in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. In Luiselli, J.K., & Fischer, A.J. (Eds.), Computer-Assisted and Web-Based Innovations in

Psychology, Special Education, and Health (pp.255-285). Elsevier. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802075-3.00010-3