Time Delay

In the context of AAC, what is a time delay?

A time delay is often used in teaching to provide the learner with sufficient time to respond. It is an evidence-based strategy in the context of AAC and can effectively increase vocalisations when used with AAC modalities such as Speech-Generating Devices and Picture Exchange Communication Systems. The idea is to pause between further prompting or reinforcement to provide the learner with the opportunity to respond or engage in any form of speech.  


Introducing a time delay can help promote autonomy, as the learner is encouraged to initiate communication independently rather than constantly being prompted, therefore reducing prompt dependency as the responsibility to commence communication is gradually shifted to the learner. It also creates more natural communication opportunities and encourages the learner to employ an active role in their communication.  

How does the use of time delay in the context of AAC promote vocalisations?

A time delay can support language use and development. Studies demonstrate that time-delay procedures can increase spontaneous speech by inserting a pause between the presentation of the preferred item and a verbal model of the target item name.  

The delay strategy is commonly used with other prompting strategies, such as an echoic model prompt, to allow for a vocal example of the word corresponding to the AAC system while providing a window for the learner to process and replicate the modelled behaviour. It provides a structured opportunity to practice their emerging vocal skills in a natural communication setting.  


There are two main types of time delay: 

Constant Time Delay (CTD)

A CTD utilises a specified delay time that remains the same across all sessions. Firstly, a 0-second delay is used, where the communication partner will provide a controlling prompt to teach the learner the correct response. Once the learner has completed one session of with a 100% success rate - move to the targeted response interval, such as 5 seconds.   


Progressive Time Delay (PTD)

When implementing a PTD, the delay interval will increase based on a predetermined criteria. For example, it may be when responses provided by the learner are correct 90% of the time over two consecutive sessions. If you are using a progressive time delay, it is important to make sure the increase of the pause time is gradual, such as by 1 second at a time. This allows the learner to adjust to the time change and learn to initiate communication on their own without becoming too frustrated. It will also help maintain a positive learning experience and build their confidence.  

How do I implement a time delay?

This strategy involves deliberately introducing a pause or brief "delay" in the interaction to encourage the learner to respond or communicate independently. A time delay can be implemented at any stage of the AAC communication process, including combined with other strategies.  


To implement a time delay, you can:  

Example: 

Max uses a Speech Generating Device. His communication partner first modelled playing with his preferred toy choice of a car and spoke the desired communication, "car." A deliberate pause of 5 seconds was given without providing any immediate assistance or repetition of the vocal model. The pause was intended to give Max an opportunity to echo the vocalisation independently. When he did not respond during the delay, his communication partner provided a further vocal prompt coupled with modelling activating the corresponding symbol on his SGD, followed by another 5-second delay. During the second delay phase, Max responded by selecting the correct symbol on the SGD and a partial vocalisation. He was immediately reinforced through positive praise and access to the desired item. During the reinforcement phase, the communication partner interacted with and continued providing multiple vocal models of words and phrases that were appropriate within the context, such as "I have a red car" and "You have a blue car."  

The above is an example of a constant time delay - in which the pause time remains the same. Alternatively, a progressive time delay can be introduced, whereby the waiting time before further prompts gradually increases alongside the learner's proficiency.  

 

It may also be helpful to consider when the time delay is inserted into the interaction. The PECS Training Manual recommends you insert a 3-second pause during Phase IV, between stating "I want" and "(item name)", to see whether the learner will fill in the blank with a vocalisation. This would be a demonstration of learner speech occurring under the control of the communication partner. You could also move the pause to immediately after receiving the sentence strip and before you say anything to see whether the learner will emit a spontaneous vocalisation, being one that does not rely on you speaking first. Some studies have seen an increase in spontaneous vocalisations when a 4-second pause was provided at the very beginning of the PECS interaction. 


For example: 

What do I need to consider about individual needs?

The duration of the time delay will vary based on individual needs. Every learner will have unique abilities and learning styles. Ensuring the delay is tailored to the learner's specific pace and needs so that they experience success and receive frequent positive reinforcement will help maintain motivation and aid their learning experience. It may be useful to start with shorter delays to assess what works for the learner and monitor and adjust as needed.    

References

Alzrayer, N.M., Aldabas, R., Alhossein, A., & Alharthi, H. (2021). Naturalistic teaching approach to develop spontaneous vocalisations and

augmented communication in children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 37(1), 14-24.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2021.1881825


Gevarter, C., O'Reilly, M.F., Kuhn, M., Mills, K., Ferguson, R., & Watkins, L. (2016). Increasing the vocalisations of individuals with autism

during intervention with a speech-generating device. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.270


Greenberg, A.L., Tomaino, M.E., & Charlop, M.H. (2014). Adapting the Picture Exchange Communication System to Elicit Vocalisations in

Children with Autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-013-9344-2


Sigafoos, J., van der Meer, L., Schlosser, R.W., Lancioni, G.E., O'Reilly, M.F., & Green, V.A. (2016). Augmentative and Alternative

Communication (AAC) in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. In Luiselli, J.K., & Fischer, A.J. (Eds.), Computer-Assisted and Web

Based Innovations in Psychology, Special Education, and Health (pp.255-285). Elsevier. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802075-3.00010-3


White, E.N., Ayres, K.A., Snyder, S.K., Cagliani, R.R., & Ledford, J.R. (2021). Augmentative and alternative communication and speech

production for individuals with ASD: A systematic review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51, 4199-4212.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04868-2. 


Walker, G. (2008). Constant and Progressive Time Delay Procedures for Teaching Children with Autism: A Literature Review. Journal of Autism

and Developmental Disorders, 38(2), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0390-4 


Warbington, C., Ampuero, M. E., & Bar, C. (2024). Increasing the mand repertoire of a child with autism using a speech-generating device with

a time-delay procedure: A practical case study. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 24(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000284